Saturday 29 March 2008

Klugman sues NBC over Quincy profit

Former Quincy, M.E. star Jack Klugman sued NBC Universal Friday, claiming the studio is lying about the show's profits and owes him money. Klugman, 85, played the crime-busting Dr. R. Quincy on the show from 1976 to 1983. His 1976 contract with NBC entitles him and his company, Sweater Productions, to 25 percent of the show's "net profits," according to the suit filed in Superior Court. Klugman claims his copy of the contract was lost when his agent died, and NBC has refused to provide a copy.

The lawsuit aims to force NBC to divulge the contract and award Klugman attorneys' fees. It also asks the court to clarify the terms of the agreement. "I recently heard that they made $250 million and it's still on TV in Germany. I don't want their money. I want my money," Klugman told The Associated Press. "I worked my tail off. I got up at four in the morning and stayed at the studio. I did rewrite, I edited."

Calls to NBC Universal Friday seeking comment Friday were not immediately returned. NBC provided Klugman with an accounting statement showing the series had lost $66 million through 2006, according to the suit. However, Klugman said he believes NBC is lying, and that it made money.

Hugh Laurie on House, fame and LA

Whether in his performance as the brilliant doctor in House or in his own ruthless self-criticism, Hugh Laurie has turned angst into an art form. Robert Crampton meets a worried man...

It may surprise some readers to learn that Hugh Laurie was “papped” – photographed without permission – on his way to this interview. We still tend to think of him as Bertie Wooster, or the less celebrated half of Fry and Laurie, or an upper-class twit in Blackadder. That view is, to say the least, out of date. What he is these days is the biggest British star on American television, hence the market for a snap of Hugh Laurie walking from a car to a photographic studio in North London. The presence of a paparazzo certainly surprised Laurie. Irritated him a little, too. “It used to be the case that the only people who paid any attention to me were those who liked what I did,” he says, drawing on the first of many cigarettes. “Now I get noticed by people who don’t care whether I live or die – probably want me to die. That takes a bit of getting used to.” But he gets a reasonable press, doesn’t he, by and large? “I don’t know. I try to avoid it. I hope you won’t be offended, but I won’t read this.”

He is, however, as he is throughout our conversation, keen not to moan. “I’ve had it a lot better than many people. I went to a pub with Kenneth Branagh once and a man shouted, ‘Oi, Branagh! You’re a cunt!’” A recent poll put Laurie in the top five favourite television personalities in the US, up there with Oprah and Jay Leno. This popularity is due to his role as Dr Gregory House, which has also won him critical acclaim (two Emmys) and financial security (he supposedly gets $200,000 per episode). “That’s an exaggeration. I am being very handsomely paid, though. My ship has come in and I’ll be forever grateful.” He has made three series of House to date, is halfway through the fourth and is signed up for three more. Will he then be able never to work again? “That would depend on how long I live,” he replies (he is 48), with impeccable logic. “If I step under a bus in a week’s time, the answer is yes.”

The holy grail of American television is to make 100 episodes (House is up to 82). “Then you sell it to syndication and it’s on for ever and it will haunt you in a Hong Kong hotel bedroom.” Will he get a slice of that? “I don’t know, I think they have to pay something to the cast.” Er, shouldn’t he find out? “That was all on page 65 of the contract. At the time [when the pilot episode was made] I blindly signed up thinking it wouldn’t go anywhere. I don’t know what the odds are [of a pilot becoming a long-running hit] – one in 100? One in 200? Not that I regret it. It’s just at the time I didn’t realise what I was getting myself into.”

What he was getting himself into was nine months a year in a rented flat in Los Angeles, away from his wife and three children in London, 15 hours of filming a day, sometimes six days a week. For obvious reasons, he is reluctant to complain, yet, “It is a bit of a gilded cage, I suppose. But what are the choices? Everything in life is an exchange of sorts. The one thing that bedevils actors, lack of security, I have gained at the expense of freedom.” Besides, there are compensations. “Southern California is beautiful. There is a real sensuous pleasure in riding to work [on his Triumph motorbike] at half past five in the morning.” Laurie is also “a huge admirer of the openness, energy, optimism and dynamism of Americans… and this idea that Americans have no sense of irony – I mean, Americans hardly do anything unironically these days. If you want a drink of water, you have to say, ‘I really don’t want a drink of water.’”

His sons are 19 and 17, his daughter 14. With another three-and-a-half series to go, his family might now move to California. “It’s taken us a long time to adjust to the permanence of it. The first year I was in a hotel. Everyone else in the show was signing leases on houses and I said, ‘You’re mad. We’re only going to last a month.’ I literally didn’t unpack. I suppose it’s a form of pessimism: if a thing is going well, it’s only a matter of time, tick tock, before someone’s going to take it away.” He says he would struggle to settle permanently in America. “I do feel very foreign there, as if I’m on safari, looking at the exotic animals and the way they behave. Then again,” he adds, “America is made up of people who don’t feel American until they do, so I’m not alone in that.”

Many interviews with Laurie focus on this pessimism, tipping over into depression. I wonder if his success in America has made him any less miserable? “Oh, I hope nothing would ever do that. I won’t let go of my roots.” As with a lot of his (near constant) irony, there’s a measure of truth in the remark. When I ask him if he has friends in LA, and he replies, “I don’t have any friends anywhere”, I’m sure that isn’t true (he and Stephen Fry are still very close), but I’m equally sure he is a hard man to get close to, something of a loner, self-sufficient. He likes to be in control, he admits. Not so much of others, but of himself – all the time. He barely drinks for that reason. “I don’t think I’ve ever been completely out of control.”

He admits he can’t shake the idea “that there is virtue in suffering, that there is a sort of psychic economy, whereby if you embrace success, happiness and comfort, these things have to be paid for”. One newspaper has taken to printing pictures of a glum-looking Laurie and asking why he doesn’t look happier, but his upbringing was Scottish Presbyterian, and Scottish Presbyterians are not supposed to look happy. “The religious aspects didn’t mean a great deal,” he says. “I admire the music, buildings and ethics of religion, but I come unstuck on the God thing.” Some of the cultural aspects of Presbyterianism, however – “the denial of pleasure, the virtues of thrift and hard work” – have stayed with him. “I had a wonderful if uneventful upbringing. My parents were very loving, but there’s no question they were suspicious of ease and comfort. My mother was the first person I can think of who was into the idea of recycling. In about 1970, she was collecting newspapers from the whole village, baling them up and taking them to a paper mill. She’d get a shilling a half ton or something.”

Does he feel guilty that he is so well paid? “Yes.” Does he feel guilty about being celebrated? “Yes. It’s absolutely preposterous. Entertainment seems to be inflating. It used to be the punctuation to your life, a film or a novel or a play, a way of celebrating a good week or month. Now it feels as if it’s all punctuation.” The people he admires are “those blokes in Fair Isle sweaters with pencils behind their ears who knew how to design mechanical things better than anybody else in the world”. Concorde, he thinks, “is the most beautiful thing. The absolute pinnacle of form and function. I cried when I saw the last flight on television. What an old codger I am!”

He saw a Vincent Black Shadow not long ago – “just breath-taking”. Motorbikes are a passion. He’s got a Yamaha in London and the Triumph in LA, which he rides “with a weird chauvinistic pride… I was watching Biker Build-Off and there was this Japanese custom bike designer called Shinya Kimura. You could tell within seconds he was a genius.” Laurie thought about buying one of Kimura’s bikes. “It was $26,000. I thought, ‘I can’t possibly justify that’, and then I thought, ‘Well, why am I doing this job?’” Did he buy it? “No. Something in me says you shouldn’t have toys.” He has, however, bought a ping pong table. “That’s a real luxury.” Is he better than his children? “Er… I’m not bad actually,” he admits shyly. I say I thought he was supposed to be Mr Self-Deprecation. “Yes, I spoke to my shrink yesterday on the phone in LA – you have to have one before they let you in – and I mentioned I was doing this [interview]. I said, ‘I can’t bear going through the same fucking dance of despair. I’m just going to say what I feel.’ And he encouraged that. So yes, I’m quite good at ping pong.” But is he better than his children? “Er… that’s a parenting issue. If I announce publicly… Er… I’d better skip over that one.” His children, he says, are “an unending delight”.

So, do I gather he doesn’t like doing interviews? “No, but who would? Obviously, you’re in a very vulnerable position. You are putting your testicles out on a chopping board. Well, not a chopping board, that’s not a good image… I get anxious about a lot of things, that’s the trouble. I get anxious about everything. I just can’t stop thinking about things all the time. And here’s the really destructive part: it’s always retrospective. I waste time thinking of what I should have said or done. I go through an experience like this and think, ‘Next time I’m not going to mention the shrink’, but I don’t learn anything.”

Given that he has mentioned the shrink, how often does he see him? “Once a week for an hour. I’d been doing this job over there for a while, and I hate to use the word stressful – it’s not stressful like being in Baghdad – but it got to me, and continues to do so from time to time in a big way. But things are only stressful if you care about them. Marcus Aurelius, I think it was who said, ‘If you are distressed by anything external, the pain is not due to the thing itself, but to your own estimate of it; and this you have the power to revoke at any moment.’” And what is it he is caring about? His performance? “Everything, actually. I’m a pain in the arse. I meddle. I have ideas about how a thing ought to be played, the psychological details, the truth. Work is almost like a piece of music, and I’m a pain in the arse about music, too.” Indeed, he has been using his three-month hiatus in London (filming of House was suspended due to the Hollywood writers’ strike) to practise the piano. “I’ve been playing a couple of hours a day. Cracked a couple of pieces I couldn’t do before. If I could, I’d do ten hours. I just love it, but I have a neck problem and it gets blindingly painful.” Is it true he’s very accomplished? “Oh that’s nonsense, complete nonsense.”

One of Laurie’s most attractive traits is that, while he may play Rachmaninov and quote philosophy, he has the self-confidence to judge more popular culture on its merits. It’s rare to meet someone who isn’t some type of snob, traditional or inverted, but Laurie, like Gregory House, is his own man. He cites Stephen King with approval, for instance, and Friends and Michael Caine. Indeed, he gets quite cross with himself at one point for misquoting Get Carter. In House, I ask, how much acting is he doing? “Oh, a lot. I’m working quite hard. I’m conscious of the artifice with every gesture.” Why has the public taken this not very likeable character to its heart? “Oh, he is likeable, he’s just not good. But we don’t only like people because they’re good. He’s funny, honest, very good at what he does. I would like him if I met him, and I also feel absurd talking about a fictional character, so I’d better stop.”

Laurie finds it ironic that his father was a doctor and “now I’m being paid, I don’t know, five times more [an underestimate, surely] to pretend to be a doctor”. William “Ran” Laurie was a GP in Blackbird Leys, the council estate built to house the workers at British Leyland’s Cowley plant near Oxford. Laurie, the youngest of Ran and Patricia Laurie’s four children, was born in Oxford in 1959. Although he says “every man feels himself to be an imperfect version of his own father”, his father was not the problem, such as there was one. “Yes, my mum was the problem,” he says, but declines to elaborate. She died when he was 29, his father ten years ago. Like his father, Laurie attended public school, in his case, Eton. “I had a happy time. I understand institutions quite well.” He does admit to “a crazy period at 16 when I thought Baader-Meinhof and the Red Brigades were strivers after social justice”. The memory of this misjudgment now embarrasses him so much that he can “hardly speak”. He remains a man of the (albeit less bloodthirsty) left. “I was in my car listening to a report on how foreign workers in Abu Dhabi are paid so little and housed so poorly, and I was pounding my leather-clad steering wheel in frustration and thinking of the fatuity of my own neuroses and self-indulgence.”

Despite the comfortable background, his parents made financial sacrifices for him to attend Eton. “I went to a very posh school with some very posh people, but I’m not especially posh myself.” He followed his father to Selwyn College, Cambridge, where, again like his father, he rowed for the university, earning a Blue in the Boat Race of 1980, a thriller that Cambridge lost by five feet. With such a narrow margin, had he ever considered it was his fault his crew lost? “No, but that’s a good point. Thanks for that.”

Laurie’s current sport is boxing. He took one of his sons to the Hatton-Mayweather fight in Las Vegas and has been sparring at a gym in North London. “I don’t know if I’m looking to affirm masculinity, but there is something going on there, a feeling of men testing themselves, and when the test is over a weirdly gentle atmosphere and a feeling of comradeship.” I tell him that the writer Tony Parsons, whom I recently interviewed, boxes at the same gym. Parsons’ dad got a DSM in 1944. Laurie’s old man won a gold medal for rowing at the 1948 Olympics. “He was in a coxless pair with a man called Jack Wilson. I’ve got a fantastic picture on my desk of the two of them getting their medals on a pontoon at Henley. I imagine they were playing the national anthem and my dad is very rigid, ‘this is the way to behave’, and Jack Wilson is loose and groovy and looks like he should be mixing a martini. I sometimes wished my father could take that pleasure in himself.”

And why can’t Laurie take pleasure in himself? What exactly is the problem? “Maybe there isn’t one,” he sighs. “Maybe I have an appetite for problems and if I can’t find one, I make things up. I did a documentary once about Victorian funerals, and to illustrate the scene these carthorses were pulling a hearse. I was chatting to the horse wrangler and he said, ‘You know, they don’t like this. It’s not heavy enough.’ This was the unbearable lightness of being from the carthorses’ point of view. They are miserable if they don’t have work to do. They want 15 tons of beer to pull to get a sweat going.”

But earlier on he’d been saying how much he had enjoyed his enforced three months of leisure, which would seem to contradict the carthorse analogy. “It would, wouldn’t it? How fascinating. How do you reconcile that? Well, I am fantastically lazy.” That’s obvious nonsense, I say. Winning a place in the Cambridge boat, becoming president of Footlights, right up to sending in his audition tape for House, there is evidence of considerable striving. He concedes he has been known to exert himself.

He says he has to act a lot to play Gregory House, not least because he assumes an American accent, but they “share certain characteristics”. The most salient one, I think, what makes both Laurie and House attractive, is intelligence, the conventional type, and emotional intelligence, self-possession, self-knowledge. I think all that therapy is paying off. “Be content to seem what you really are,” Marcus Aurelius said, and I think Laurie (almost) is.

When I ask Laurie why he got a third at Cambridge, he says, typically: “Because I am very, very stupid.” But what strikes me most forcibly, having spoken to him for a couple of hours, is the strength of his intellect. He seems to be a man who thinks about life with a clear mind and has developed the capacity, and the curse, of being able to identify both sides of an issue. As his favourite Stoic wrote: “To the wise, life is a problem; to the fool, a solution.”

I’m sure he does not need me to direct him towards another piece of wisdom from Marcus Aurelius: “Waste no more time arguing about what a good man should be. Be one.” Or more pertinently: “Let not your mind run on what you lack as much as on what you have already.”

House has returned to Five, on Thursdays at 9pm

Russell tussles with the return of Doctor Who

As Doctor Who returns for a fourth series writer Russell T Davies tells Andrew Pettie about the Doctor's new companion played by Catherine Tate, and what his favourite monster is...

One of the few underwhelming things about Russell T Davies is that the ‘T’ in his name doesn’t stand for anything. Davies inserted it early in his career to distinguish himself from the Radio 2 presenter Russell Davies. Now, though, he prefers to use it as the excuse for a series of preposterous fibs. ‘I always make stories up about what the T stands for,’ he says. ‘Like “The” or “Tussle”. That’s my favourite one: Russell Tussle Davies. Though I actually hate the T. It always looks strange to me.’

These days, as the writer and executive producer of the regenerated Doctor Who, which returns for a fourth series on Saturday, Davies is famous enough to discard it. Unlike most television writers, he is regularly recognised in the street. ‘It happens all the time, especially in Cardiff [where Doctor Who and its sister show Torchwood are filmed],’ he says. ‘Kids walk up and start talking to you. I think it’s nice that children realise that somebody like a writer even exists on a TV drama, because I don’t think I did at that age. Also, whereas adults might complain about a character they didn’t like or tell you who they want to see as the next companion, children ask you what’s your favourite monster and why – which is much more fun.’

Davies’s favourite monsters, in case your children have yet to ask him, are the Daleks. He has one in his front hall. ‘I love Daleks,’ he says. ‘I think they’re brilliant. That’s why I insisted that we shouldn’t change the design. They still work after 45 years – Daleks are a design classic. I honestly think they’re iconically beautiful.’

Although Davies is anxious to preserve some of Doctor Who’s cherished traditions, he also feels compelled to reinvent it. For the fourth series, the Doctor (David Tennant) will have a new companion, Donna Noble (Catherine Tate), who previously appeared in the 2006 Christmas special, The Runaway Bride. ‘There’s a danger that we could settle into a rut,’ Davies explains. ‘That’s why we’ve started each series with a new set of lead actors. It reinvigorates the show. I love the fact that Donna’s a little bit older than the Doctor, and that she’s not in love with him, as our other companions have each been to some extent. He needs a challenge.’ That’s not to say Donna’s predecessor Martha Jones (Freema Agyeman) has been airbrushed from history. As well as appearing in Torchwood, Agyeman will return in episodes four and five of the new series of Doctor Who.

Other special guests include Sarah Lancashire, Alex Kingston and Felicity Kendal, who Davies says stars in an ‘Agatha Christie-style murder mystery. She plays Lady Edison, the lady of the house with secrets to keep…’ Davies sounds most excited, however, about episode two, which is set in Pompeii. Any of the 13million viewers who saw last year’s Christmas episode, in which a space ship named The Titanic almost crashed into Buckingham Palace, will expect the spectacular. ‘The Pompeii episode is so ambitious,’ Davies says, ‘that we had a script that was easier to film standing by, in case someone turned round and said, “This is impossible.” The whole thing was terrifying, and a nightmare to film, but that’s what makes it good in the end. It’s a glorious episode.’

Davies, who seems almost alarmingly enthusiastic about Doctor Who, sounds as if he could go on making it forever. He has already written this year’s Christmas special (‘It’s set in the Victorian era. So expect plum pudding, death and disaster’). But after a hiatus in 2009, when there will only be two one-off specials, Davies will step aside for a new executive producer, Piers Wenger, to oversee series five, which is scheduled to air in 2010. Davies, a perfectionist, doesn’t strike you as someone who will find it easy letting go. But he insists he’ll cope. ‘The day I leave Doctor Who I will just walk away,’ he says. ‘I would never want to hang on as a ghost of what I was. I would be a nightmare! I’d be that voice at the back of the set going, “Oh, I wouldn’t do it that way.”’

Davies already has plans for what he’ll write next. He’s keeping his ideas to himself (‘In case someone steals them’) but the writer of Channel 4’s groundbreaking gay drama Queer as Folk says he’s eager to return to similarly grown-up themes. ‘I’d love to do another nine o’clock drama,’ he says. ‘There’s a whole world of drama and emotion and honesty that has no place in Doctor Who. I once got very, very stuck writing an episode of Doctor Who and on that night I watched Peter Morgan’s Longford. I’m dying to do something that risky, that real. It was just so brilliant and there I was writing about the interior of a space ship. I thought, “What am I doing with my life?” Luckily, though,’ he beams, ‘the space ship was fantastic.’

Doctor Who is on BBC1 on Saturday, 29 March at 6.20pm

David Tennant: The good doctor

The most powerful actor in television is also, by all accounts, the nicest bloke in showbiz writes Tim Walker...

British drama boasts but a handful of truly timeless roles. Many attempt to play them, and many fall short of perfection. Few get the chance to take on two such characters, but this year David Tennant has just that opportunity.

In July, Tennant begins a season in Stratford, playing Hamlet for the Royal Shakespeare Company. Though this versatile and popular actor may never find himself heading up the list of great Danes that includes Mark Rylance, David Warner and Laurence Olivier, his reputation as a British cultural icon is nonetheless secure. A poll conducted by the BBC in 2006 found that he was the nation's favourite Doctor Who – beating Jon Pertwee, Christopher Eccleston and even Tom Baker to the title. Last year Tennant, who is 36, came in at number 24 in a recent media power list, making him the most powerful actor in television. He's also, by all accounts, the nicest bloke in showbiz.

Doctor Who returns next week for its fourth series (and Tennant's third) since it was so successfully relaunched by writer-producer Russell T Davies in 2005. The Doctor's latest adventures are, as ever, under wraps, the plot twists and turns as shrouded in secrecy as a new Harry Potter novel. What is known, beyond the fact that Catherine Tate will be playing the Time Lord's assistant, is that Tennant's sparkling performances will carry the show again.

"In this series we've pushed the Doctor further than he's ever gone before," says Davies. "I've made 39 episodes with David now, and I'm still going, 'My God, I've never seen him do that before.' He's just limitless. Sometimes you find yourself writing for actors and allowing for their traits. There's nothing worse than sitting at your desk at two in the morning thinking, 'I can't have them cry in this scene, because they're no good at crying,' which you find with actors sometimes. But there's none of that with David. You can watch him in Doctor Who, and then in a serious drama like Recovery [in which he played a husband recovering from a serious head injury], and it's like you're watching a different man. In Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire he has a small part, but it's a perfect little distillation of evil. You can write anything for him. You're never bored, and you never want him to have bad lines of dialogue. You want to do your best for him."

Last year Tennant won the National Television Award for most popular actor. The BBC has such confidence in that popularity that it has given him time off to play Hamlet, a commitment that rules out a Doctor Who series for 2009. Instead, there will be three bank holiday specials spread through next year, with a fifth full series reaching our screens in 2010, to which Tennant is already informally committed. "I think it's genuinely exciting that he's playing Hamlet," says Davies. "I keep asking him what he's going to do with it and he doesn't know yet. He hasn't had time to concentrate, but it's a brilliant bit of casting. You'll get people in that theatre who would never normally go and watch Hamlet at the RSC. There'll be kids there who, in 60 years' time, will remember when they saw their first Hamlet."


Tennant has a thoroughly congenial reputation, and not just among luvvies. Newspaper diarists, who often find themselves at the sharp end of a dressing down from a celebrity, say he's a perfect gentleman, always polite and ready to talk when cornered at a media event. He is one of the few public figures approved by celebrity gossip site Popbitch, which has posted more than one tale of Tennant's loveliness and largesse. And Davies positively gushes with praise for his star. "People can get tired and ratty on set, but David never does. There must be times when he feels low, but he feels the responsibility of leading the team. It's not his job to lead. As an actor, he could be miserable as fuck if he wanted to be. But he's a proper leader of men."

Tennant was born David John McDonald in West Lothian in 1971, the son of a local minister in Paisley, who later became a national figure as Moderator of the Church of Scotland. After taking part in the BBC's genealogy documentary strand Who Do You Think You Are? in 2006, Tennant learned that the Northern Irish branch of his family had been embroiled in the Troubles. He was unsettled to hear of his ancestors' involvement with the Orange Order, but glad to reveal that his grandfather, Archie McLeod, was a professional footballer with Derry City FC.

A fanatical Doctor Who fan even as a toddler, Tennant claims he told his parents he wanted to be an actor aged just three, so inspired was he by the Pertwee and Baker incarnations of his fictional hero. Thus he knows full well the enormous responsibility that comes with the role. "Playing the Doctor is a massive duty," says Davies. "David is brilliant with the kids and other fans who accost him in public. The glorious thing is that he was there as a child, loving Tom Baker and Peter Davison, so he knows how important it is to a kid when they meet him."

After leaving Paisley Grammar School, Tennant trained at the Royal Scottish Academy of Music and Drama, where he adopted his stage name after reading an article on Pet Shop Boys frontman Neil Tennant. Among the institution's many esteemed alumni are Robert Carlyle, Alan Cumming and James McAvoy. After graduating, Tennant found work with the Scottish agitprop theatre company 7:84, so named for the 7 per cent of the UK's population who supposedly control 84 per cent of its wealth. Like that other famous son of the manse, Gordon Brown, Tennant is a lifelong socialist, and even appeared in a party political broadcast for the Labour Party in 2005.

He moved to London in the early 1990s to lodge with his friend, the comic actress and writer Arabella Weir, whose success with The Fast Show soon rubbed off on her flatmate. During the 1990s, he worked often with the RSC, and switched between comedy and tragedy with ease, playing Touchstone in As You Like It in 1996, and Romeo in Romeo and Juliet in 2000. Though it's television that gave him the fame necessary to play Hamlet, Tennant has always said the theatre is his natural home. He will be joined in Stratford this summer by another sci-fi Shakespearean, Star Trek's Patrick Stewart, as Hamlet's treacherous uncle Claudius.

In 1996, Tennant appeared in Michael Winterbottom's film of Jude, which starred the ninth Doctor Who, Christopher Eccleston. By then the young Scot was a BBC regular, taking larger and larger roles in the corporation's dramas, working for a decade to achieve his eventual, "overnight" success. In 2004, he landed one of the lead roles in the corporation's hit musical drama Blackpool. Doctor Who, and all that part entailed, followed, but Tennant has maintained a busy itinerary full of other projects, including the forthcoming biopic Einstein and Eddington, in which he plays Einstein's contemporary, Sir Arthur Eddington.

Tennant's private life has occasionally been the subject of decidedly non-fevered tabloid speculation. After splitting with his long-term girlfriend Sophia Myles last year, he was briefly rumoured to be dating Kylie Minogue, who appeared in a Christmas special episode of Doctor Who. Tennant has since confirmed that he's in a relationship with a low-profile BBC colleague, Bethan Britton. His co-stars have nothing but praise for his talents and his character, and there's never been a whiff of scandal about him.

The Pink Paper once granted Tennant the title of "sexiest man in the universe", but despite having played Casanova for a BBC3 miniseries, Tennant's good looks are not of the movie star variety. He is skinny and angular, with limbs that can flail with comic urgency as Doctor Who, or crazed hostility as they did when he played the deranged Barty Crouch Jr in Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. His tall, lean physiognomy will set him apart from the other notable Hamlets of recent years – among them the chubby Simon Russell Beale, the slight Ben Whishaw and the testosteronic Toby Stephens.

He won the role of Doctor Who after impressing Davies on the set of Casanova in 2005, but even Davies himself has been shocked by the wild success of the show and its star. "The show's success is so mad that I don't think any of us will get our heads round it till it's all over and we look back on it in 10 years' time and say, 'Blimey, that was weird,'" says the writer. "But I think what the public like about David is his energy. He glitters on screen; there's a vitality to him that is undeniably what has worked with the Doctor. On set we're surrounded by props and monsters and explosions and things often go wrong. When they do we say to each other, 'Well, at least we've got David.' We put the camera on him and it just comes to life."

Friday 28 March 2008

BBC chief has radical designs on internet

Civil servant Mark Thompson wants to turn the British Broadcasting Corp. into an empire on which the sun never sets reports Aaron O. Patrick in the Wall Street Journal. To do that, the BBC's 50-year-old chief executive is determined to get the world to watch more British drama, comedy and news online. His push has required radical job cuts and new business strategies -- and has put him in conflict with private media companies and BBC workers. Today the BBC's union is expected to announce that members have approved job cuts and salary concessions that will free up funds for Mr. Thompson's vision.

Mr. Thompson's push raises a counter-intuitive possibility: The world's oldest and largest public broadcaster may emerge as a pioneer of new ways of delivering TV news and entertainment. The taxpayer-financed BBC doesn't have to worry about advertisers or delivering results to Wall Street. It owns most of its own shows, so it can control how they appear online. As such, the 85-year-old global behemoth can focus on the industry's most pressing problem: keeping viewers in the Internet age. "It's not about TV," Mr. Thompson says in an interview. "It's about content and ways of getting content to people." The BBC's digital push is being watched by rivals with fascination. NBC Universal's Chief Executive Jeff Zucker says Mr. Thompson is changing the BBC in a way "that some people who are beholden to the old way of doing things don't necessarily like." Some of Mr. Thompson's initiatives are generating protest, particularly from rival media companies, who argue that the BBC's government funding gives it an unfair advantage.

British newspapers complain the BBC's expanded Web site is stealing traffic away from their sites. The broadcaster plans to set up dozens of Web sites to provide local news for towns and cities across Britain, for example, potentially harming already-struggling regional newspapers. "We've learnt in this digital landscape the BBC's impact on other media players is much broader than when it was just a broadcaster -- it's now newspapers, magazines and Web sites," says Simon Waldman, group director of digital strategy and development of the Guardian Media Group PLC, which owns the Guardian and several regional newspapers. Other media companies complain about BBC initiatives designed to generate more revenue, steps needed to fund the BBC's technology push.

One of the BBC's competitors is News Corp., which owns a 39.1% stake in U.K. satellite broadcaster British Sky Broadcasting Group PLC. News Corp. also owns The Wall Street Journal. A BBC spokesman says all projects that could harm commercial competitors have to be approved by the BBC Trust, an independent body set up to oversee the broadcaster. Unlike U.S. networks, which have only made tentative steps on the Internet for fear of losing advertising revenue, the BBC has thrown almost its entire schedule online. To do that, the broadcaster has bet big on iPlayer, a free computer program offered via the BBC's Web site and Apple Inc.'s iPhone, which allows anyone in the U.K. to download and watch BBC shows that have appeared in the past week.

Launched on Christmas Day, the iPlayer is already emerging as a cultural phenomenon, particularly among young viewers. About 17 million BBC shows were downloaded in the seven weeks after iPlayer's launch, compared with one million videos sold in the first three weeks after TV shows were put on Apple's iTunes store. BBC executives say they believe the iPlayer will become the industry standard in Britain and will be launched in the U.S. this year.

The BBC was established in 1922 by a government charter to inform the British people of the news. Today it is one of Britain's most powerful cultural institutions, commanding a weekly global audience of 233 million for its news programs alone. The BBC has an annual budget of £4 billion ($8.03 billion) -- dwarfing the U.S. Public Broadcasting Service's $522 million. The BBC is funded mostly by a £131.50 annual tax levied on each television owner in the U.K.

Mr. Thompson is part of a long tradition of graduates of top British universities joining the BBC. Educated at old-line boarding school Stonyhurst College and Oxford University, Mr. Thompson won highest honours in English, edited a literary journal and won a prize for literary criticism. Immediately after graduation in 1979, he joined the BBC as a research trainee. With his first-class degree and a reputation for disciplined work habits, he was quickly tagged a future director-general, the BBC's top post, colleagues say. He is also preternaturally confident. He declines to discuss the influence of religion in his life, but friends say Mr. Thompson, fueled by his Catholic faith, is driven by a strong sense of destiny. "Self doubt, that's not a big issue for me," Mr. Thompson says.

The predictions proved true, and Mr. Thompson became director-general of the BBC in 2004. He lives with his wife, Jane Blumberg, a biographer, and three children in Oxford, and rides his bicycle to the train station to commute to London. Soon after becoming director general, Mr. Thompson hired Tim Davie, a marketer from PepsiCo Inc. Mr. Davie studied about 5,000 people in panels, the largest research of BBC viewers ever. What he learned was discouraging. One-quarter of 15-to-24-year-olds didn't watch, read or listen to the BBC at all in an average week. Many preferred to play computer games or socialize online. If the BBC stayed as it was, by 2015 only 60% of people in Britain would get some form of BBC news each week, the study found, down from 81% today. If that happened, the British government could argue it doesn't need to give the BBC as much money.

Mr. Thompson, who envisioned the BBC becoming a global media force, quickly concluded the broadcaster needed to try to make everything it created available online in some form, so viewers, particularly younger ones, could watch BBC shows whenever they wanted. "Everything should be digital," he says. "That was maybe the only really big idea I was going to bring into the place." The idea quickly ran into the inertia of a state-run company. At the time, different departments in the sprawling BBC empire had separate Internet budgets. As a result, Ashley Highfield, director of future media and technology, says he couldn't move on even simple projects like a new children's Web site because many departments refused to contribute money.

So in November 2006, Mr. Thompson gave Mr. Highfield control of all Internet spending, increasing his budget to £400 million from £100 million, Mr. Highfield says. One project that had moved slowly for years in development at Mr. Highfield's division was the iPlayer. The iPlayer "points to a world where you choose whatever you want" to watch on computers or even cellphones, says Mr. Thompson. He says he encouraged Mr. Highfield to move fast. But finding money for the project wasn't easy. Already, the U.K. government had tightened the purse strings on Mr. Thompson in his most recent budget review, giving him about £20 billion in funding over the next six years through the TV tax, £2 billion less than he sought.

The government's decision forced Mr. Thompson to make some difficult choices. There wasn't enough money to carry out his expensive digital plans and maintain the level of TV and news output. Budget debates inside the BBC are "sometimes vicious," with departments publicly lobbying for themselves, says Jenny Abramsky, the head of BBC radio and a member of the executive committee. To avoid a nasty fight, Mr. Thompson gathered his 15-strong executive committee at a hotel near London for a two-day budget conference after the government's budget decision in January 2007. Mr. Thompson chose not to dominate the meeting, keeping his preferences quiet so the group could reach a consensus. After hours of debate, everyone agreed to put £131 million into the iPlayer over five years. Other technology projects got the green light, too, including MyBBCRadio, which will allow people to create a kind of personalized radio station of their favorite music, and a revamp of the BBC Web site.

To pay for these projects, the group had to find steep cuts. They agreed to eliminate some 2,500 of BBC's 23,000 staff. About half the cuts would come from the news and television divisions. The group also agreed to cut £100 million from the £1.2 billion TV budget. At the same time, they decided to hire an additional 700 people for digital projects. The budget bombed with unions representing BBC staff. They threatened to stage a series of strikes, angry that the BBC was firing journalists to "close in on Google," says Paul McLaughlin, an organizer for the National Union of Journalists. "You have got to realize that 99% of the audience is more focused on the normal channels."

After negotiating through the night on Jan. 22 of this year, a day before the final strike vote, the unions and BBC reached a deal. The BBC made some salary concessions, and the unions called off the strike. BBC staff had until Thursday to accept the deal in a postal vote. Mr. Thompson also saw another source of additional funds: BBC Worldwide Ltd., a separate for-profit unit that sells BBC shows, magazines and merchandise around the world. Mr. Thompson believed the BBC unit could do more overseas. Over the next year, BBC Worldwide will be launching more than a dozen kids', entertainment and documentary channels, with new magazines and Web sites. The goal: increasing profit to £200 million by 2012, from about £100 million in the year ended March 31, 2007.

In the U.S., the BBC is spending heavily in hopes of building out BBC America, a cable channel that has struggled for years to attract viewers. To run the channel, early last year the BBC hired American TV-network veteran Garth Ancier, a former president of NBC Entertainment who had also held senior jobs at Fox, Turner Broadcasting and WB Television Network. Mr. Ancier and other BBC executives are shaking up the BBC's distribution of its programs. Instead of selling them to other networks, Mr. Ancier has been keeping them for his own channel. The additional viewers -- and advertising -- should compensate for lost sales, he says. (The BBC is prohibited from showing ads in the U.K. but is free to do elsewhere.) As a result, since he took over a year ago, some of the BBC's most popular shows among foreign broadcasters, including Torchwood and Robin Hood, are now on BBC America.

Mr. Ancier also cut back on costume dramas and miniseries, the BBC's bread-and-butter in Britain, because he thinks viewers come for such one-time events but don't return. BBC America also added a one-hour daily newscast this fall called BBC World News America. Ratings for BBC World News America so far are minuscule -- Nielsen says the newscast has averaged 79,000 viewers this year. But it has featured some big-name interviews, including one with President George W. Bush, who appeared on the show last month to speak about his recent trip to Africa. A BBC spokeswoman says the channel is expected to become profitable, though she declined to say when.

Some traditional customers of BBC fare -- including TV networks in Canada and the U.S. -- don't like BBC America's more aggressive approach. For example, Mr. Ancier says he plans to renegotiate a deal with PBS to force its affiliates broadcast BBC news bulletins less frequently. The bulletins may be reducing interest in BBC World News America, he explains. If the BBC limits access, PBS would likely lose funding from its corporate sponsors because of lost viewership and have to drop BBC news broadcasts entirely, says Terrel Cass, president and general manager of WLIW in Long Island, New York, which distributes BBC news to 220 PBS affiliates. Mr. Cass says he hopes to persuade the BBC to change its mind. "We reach 816,000 homes a day," he says. "Garth's numbers are infinitesimal compared with that."

A BBC spokeswoman said it is confident PBS stations won't have to drop BBC news. Mr. Thompson has a simple reply: He says he would rather people watch BBC shows on BBC channels. "The barriers to entry around the world are coming down," he says. "There is enormous potential to get BBC content to consumers around the world."

Nasty, but not so brutish and short

In its depiction of the early reigning years of Henry VIII, The Tudors, which returns on Sunday for its second somnolent season on Showtime, plays a game of historical hopscotch. Timelines are abbreviated, papacies are rearranged, and while the show’s creators have adequately defended these practices as a means of narrative efficiency, they have yet to be held accountable for producing a version of Tudor England that appears to have been spritzed with Febreze, observes Ginia Bellafante.

Beyond theological fissures and the dramatic restructuring of feudal economies, life in England during the 16th century continued to be distinguished by a stench no modern nose could easily sustain. “Even in the goodliest and stateliest palaces of our realm,” John Harington wrote in 1596 about his invention of an early flush toilet, “still this same whoreson saucy stink.” No matter how much sex The Tudors has given us — Henry’s behaviour as if a member of the Emperor’s Club V.I.P. proceeds unabated this season — it is a show that never gets quite dirty enough. Last season it contained the devastations of the plague more or less to a single episode, the camera passing over the night-blue faces of beautiful women taken too young — the Black Death as a fashion shoot you would find in Italian Vogue. Henry, played by Jonathan Rhys Meyers, lived in consuming terror of the disease, working himself into an expedient perspiration every time he felt the slightest bit woozy or unwell. One scene had him waking in the middle of the night to do push-ups and jog ferociously in shorts in his chambers, his perfectly demarcated abdominals and deltoids exposed so that he looked like someone you would hire to be your live-in personal trainer.

The Tudors has always struggled to calibrate a tone, both aural and visual, that might feel true to its period without seeming absurdly anachronistic. The show lets modernity blaze through in the form of implausibly well-groomed faces; Henry shifts from regal formal locutions to outbursts that make him seem like the ornery head of a construction company, and the effect is disorienting, as if you’re seeing someone at a memorial service in clothing exclamatory or garish. The current season has Henry dividing his considerable energy between the beds of his new wife, Anne Boleyn (Natalie Dormer) and her various ladies in waiting, one of whom Anne selects for him. The plot having been hijacked by his failed struggle to annul his marriage to Katherine of Aragon from the Roman Catholic Church, Henry marries Anne in secret. He seems to be drawn with even less complexity now; he isn’t charismatically dislikable, he is plainly odious. We find him refusing a Christmas gift from Katherine (Maria Doyle Kennedy) once he has solidified his union with Anne.

Given that the writers don’t hold themselves to standards of strict historical accuracy, they might have asked themselves: What would Tony Soprano have done? He would not have sent back a chalice or a holiday panettone, especially not to a woman who still loved him, no matter the depths of enmity. Mr. Rhys Meyers, who showed such a talent for displays of moral enigma in Woody Allen’s Match Point, seems to have been asked to keep all that dimension to himself here.

If The Tudors fails to live up to the great long-form dramas cable television has produced, it is not simply because it refuses the visceral messiness of a Rome or a Deadwood (the corpse-eating pigs!) but more significantly because it radically reduces the era’s thematic conflicts to simplistic struggles over personal and erotic power. The Tudors makes it seem as if the entire creation of the Anglican Church boiled down to Henry’s wish to remarry and sire a male heir. (When Anne gives birth to a daughter this season, the future Elizabeth I, Henry looks as if he were a little boy who got the wrong kind of tricycle at Christmas.) The Sopranos, The Wire and Big Love all have derived their potency from dramatizing the preservation of failing institutions. The paradox of The Tudors is that it takes on one of the most powerful and protested institutions in human history — the Catholic Church during the Renaissance — and provides little sense of what the English people have to gain or lose by breaking with it.

Peter O’Toole arrives this season as Pope Paul III, playing him as a drawing-room wit, a delicious performance that only serves to mitigate further any sense of the papacy’s hegemony. Henry VIII was a man of extreme faith who attended Mass five times a day. Watching The Tudors you’d think he spent most of that time shaving.

The Tudors is on Showtime, Sunday night at 9, Eastern and Pacific times; 8, Central time

Further reading: Sexy Henry VIII needs no codpiece

Eick adapting Children of Men for the small screen

David Eick is writing a pilot script for a TV version of Children of Men. The story originated with P.D. James's science-fiction novel and was adapted for film in 2006 with Clive Owen in the lead role.

Eick, who steered the Battlestar Galactia and Bionic Woman remakes, is looking to make the proposed series a faithful adaptation of the book. "It's really taking root more in the origins of the novels in that it will focus on the cultural movement in which young people become the society's utter focus," he explained to Sci Fi Wire. "Much like our culture, whenever Lindsay Lohan does something [and] it becomes the headline of every news show, it's about how, when you don't have a responsibility to the next generation and you're free to do whatever you want, where do you draw the line?"

Eick added that the pilot would differ from the film and explore ideas of social responsibility and freedom. "It's a very compelling, human question that science-fiction has always explored extremely provocatively," he said. "It's not really a war show like the movie was. It's more an exploration of that issue."


Elsewhere, Doctor Who will lose 1.5m viewers per show because of BBC One's decision to move it from 7pm to 6.20pm, according to executive producer Russell T Davies. The drama will take up the new slot when it returns on April 5 to allow I'd Do Anything to air at 7.10pm. Davies said he was worried because the series is the last full run of Who before 2010. Next year there will be three specials. "At 6.20pm, it'll get 1.5m less viewers than it already has," he said, speaking at a Broadcast event in London. "I've told them this, but they won't shift at all. You need to maintain slots and they've gone and cocked it up now. Maybe they're right, but I think they're wrong."

The producer, who was behind the revival of the show, also confessed to rewriting others' scripts if he did not like them. He said: "I'll rewrite 100% if I have to. With Steven Moffat's scripts, I don't touch a word, but anyone else's I do... We're not there to experiment and we're not there to let someone fail. You've got to do everything you can to make it brilliant every week."


In other news, Tahmoh Penikett, Fran Kranz, Dichen Lachman and Enver Gjokaj have joined the new series from Buffy the Vampire Slayer creator Joss Whedon. The drama is about a group of men and women, known as dolls, who are charged with carrying out a series of "assignments". They can be imprinted with different memories, skills, language and abilities appropriate to each task.

Penikett (Battlestar Galactica) will play FBI agent Paul Smith who wants to find the dolls, viewed by others as an urban myth. Kranz (Welcome to the Captain) joins as bright-spark programmer Topher Brink who does the imprinting. Lachman (Neighbours) and Gjokaj takes the role of dolls Sierra and Victor respectively. Both are friends of main doll Echo who begins to become self-aware. Eliza Dushku (Buffy, Angel) has already signed to play Echo.

Fox is planning a seven-episode season of the show for September.

Further reading: Welcome to Josh Whedon's Dollhouse

Spitting Image CGI style

Politicians will come to dread Sunday nights again when ITV reinvents Spitting Image as a computer-animated show with a fresh mandate to be merciless. So many suffered at the comic hand of Spitting Image’s latex caricatures that the only ignominy worse than being lampooned was to be excluded. Twelve years after the programme ended, Spitting Image’s head writer, Henry Naylor, and Rory Bremner are preparing to show Headcases, a new £2.5 million topical satire show in the same ITV Sunday night slot.

Instead of puppets, Gordon Brown, Amy Winehouse and Prince William, among others, are captured using CGI-animation in the style of films such as Toy Story. Robert Mugabe, Alistair Darling, Piers Morgan, Fabio Capello, the Beckhams, Nicolas Sarkozy and Dmitry Medvedev, presented as Vladimir Putin’s puppet, are among those on the cast list, which is limited to 64. But Jack Straw, Ed Balls, David Davis and Vincent Cable failed to pass the producers’ “public recognition test”.

Boris Johnson is banned until May, much to the writers’ disappointment, under electoral broadcasting rules. Headcases would have had to include Brian Paddick, the Liberal Democrat candidate in the mayoral election, which could have hit the show’s ratings. Jacqui Smith, the Home Secretary, may not be flattered by her depiction. She is awarded a prodigious bust which expands and contracts in line with the terrorist threat to Britain.

Gordon Brown is portrayed as a miserable Dickensian penny-pincher. He is tricked by Tony Blair into throwing a celebrity Downing Street party. But only Pete Doherty and Amy Winehouse turn up when his henchman, Alistair Darling, whose catchprase is “We’re doomed”, gives the invitations to the Revenue & Customs to post. Mr Brown then sells his dissolute guests lager at 15p a can. David Cameron is an Etonian toff with a sinister sneer. He is constantly undermined by his “squirt”, a school-capped George Osbourne and William Hague, who downs 17 pints of bitter and bangs on about Europe.

Music will play its part, with “Old Mugabe had a Farm” featuring the Zimbabwean tyrant destroying the country’s agriculture. Actors’ movements are digitally captured to create the high-quality animation, which will be produced by Red Vision, of Manchester. Episodes will be completed hours before transmission to maintain a topical edge. The voice artists include Bremner, Katy Brand and Lucy Porter. The series begins next week and lawyers are poring over a sketch in which Lord Coe seeks British athletes to take part in a “drug Olympics” as the only way to win medals at the London 2012 games. Inevitably, Winehouse and Doherty answer the call.

Naylor said: “It is bold of ITV to commission a new satire in the Spitting Image slot with a high political content. When Spitting Image was at its peak there were great ideological divides. But surveys today show that most people can’t recognise who is in the Cabinet. Part of our mission is to make politics accessible to people.” This time round, politicians share top billing with celebrities from many other spheres. Saurabh Kakkar, ITV Controller of Comedy, said: “Thank God for Heather Mills McCartney.” Sir Paul may not share the sentiment.

Headcases is on ITV1, Sundays from 6 April

Further reading: An entire political era was covered in rubber

What difference does it make?

Last night's TV reviewed: Ashes to Ashes

So now we know the crucial question to ask about Ashes to Ashes, thinks Mark Warman: is Gene Hunt supposed to be God? That was surely the implication of one of his last lines in the closing episode of the first series. "I'm everywhere," he said after coming unexpectedly to Alex Drake's side in her hour of need. "I was needed and I was there." James Walton had two slightly more prosaic enquiries on his mind as the closing episode unfurled last night. First, would the delectable DI Alex Drake (Keeley Hawes) make it back to the 21st century from her nightmarish entrapment in 1981? And secondly, would the sexual tension that has been ratcheting up inexorably between her and DCI Gene Hunt (Philip Glenister) finally find an outlet, or at least some form of limited release?

In light of the fact that the BBC has already commissioned a second series, it was probably inevitable that the answer to the latter questions would be a resounding no. Indeed, the only real surprise in last night’s episode was just how little was resolved by it. And how little impact it appeared to have on the usually highly emotional Drake. Sure, she got upset (producing two of the most ear-piercing screams in TV history) when she failed to prevent that much-heralded car bomb, and discovered that it was her beloved father who was – suicidally – responsible for the explosion. But the fact that the cracking of this central conundrum didn’t affect her own psychological incarceration in the past hardly seemed to matter to her. In the end she was left much as she had begun eight weeks ago, slurping Chianti with the lads in Luigi’s and emptily promising that she wouldn’t give up the fight to find her way home.


This kind of emotional inconsistency has been the biggest flaw in Drake, as a character, throughout the series. It’s a problem that never afflicted her Life on Mars predecessor, Sam Tyler (John Simm). Tyler’s enigmatic story was the pivot around which everything else turned. In Ashes to Ashes, though, Drake has often seemed a mere adjunct to the ongoing comic adventures of Gene Hunt and his motley crew of cartoonish pre-PC coppers. It is a form of schizophrenia that has affected the series at every level, this desire to have it all – to juggle high drama with broad humour, to blend the absurd with the intense. And it hasn’t made for a comfortable mix. Last night’s spurious sub-plot about Lord Scarman’s station visit, for instance, inevitably undermined the momentum of Drake’s race against time to save her parents.

For the Independent's Robert Hanks the problem was that although Ashes to Ashes came to a sort of end, with Alex Drake thrust back in time to 1981, rushing to prevent her parents' murder, and failing, it was not clear what difference this was supposed to make to anything (given that we know this was all going on in her head, what effect could success have had?), and therefore it was difficult to care. The denouement did contain an unexpected twist but it was also unconvincing, for the simple reason that it was a resolution, and in real life those are rare.

Undoubtedly, Ashes to Ashes was a crushing disappointment, perhaps the biggest slap to a drooling, expectant audience since The Matrix Reloaded suggests Mike Anderiesz. It's what , in fact, made last night's episode an unexpected delight - tightly constructed, expertly directed, and as clever a use of CGI trickery as the small screen has seen. Which begs the question of whether this particular shark has miraculously been un-jumped, promising a second series that could yet elevate it to classic status.

Admittedly, the show had a serious mountain to climb after the first five or so episodes. With its relentless and obtrusive 80s soundtrack, gaping plot holes and Keeley Hawes as a particularly screechy, annoying heroine, it seemed everything that was slick and subtle about Life on Mars had been undone by a script that played it for easy in-jokes and a predictable but unlikely romance between Gene Hunt and "Bolly Knickers".

And yet in the finale, most of the unanswered questions were dealt with in particularly satisfying fashion. Why didn't Alex Drake simply confront her parents with knowledge of their impending doom, surely worth a try you'd think? What was the purpose of the clown, other than an obvious and overplayed reference to Bowie's legendary pop video? And above all, when was the Jean Genie going to exert the real influence over his department we always knew he had? Luckily, pride was restored in a defiant showdown with Lord Scarman (played with customary relish by Geoffrey Palmer) that had both the station, and I suspect half the audience, on their feet.

OK, the plot played a few trump cards we had no reason to suspect the writers had up their sleeves. Without giving anything away, by keeping the real murderer hidden for most of the series it was easy to assume it was one of two obvious suspects. However, the final revelation was still expertly achieved, making this perhaps a more impressive series finale than Life on Mars' first. It may not be enough to restore parity between the two - Mars remains a better acted, plotted and executed show by a significant margin, but at least it raises hope that unexplored strands will yet come together in series two.

Will Drake get home in time for her horrible stage-school daughter's birthday? Will Gene eventually turn on her? Above all, will anyone remember that although Sam Tyler is supposed to be dead, his body was never actually found? For me, it's the thought of John Simm crawling through the wreckage to explain everything that makes the second series a genuinely tempting prospect. Which is why, despite my complaints, as the end credits rolled and Hunt and Drake raised a glass to the supremely nostalgic strains of Supertramp’s Take the Long Way Home, I am still looking forward to next year.

Thursday 27 March 2008

Rush on for Network Ten

Australian channel Network Ten have announced a new Australian drama series Rush to be produced in Melbourne. Rush is a contemporary action drama series set in a critical incident police unit; providing an insider's view of police under pressure. Our heroes are a mobile squad trained to be smarter, tactically superior and technologically advantaged.

Rush features an ensemble cast including Rodger Corser (The Starter Wife, Last Man Standing, Underbelly), Callan Mulvey (Underbelly, Heartbreak High, Home and Away), Catherine McClements (The Secret Life Of Us,Mary Bryant, After the Deluge) and Claire Van Der Boom (Love My Way, East West 101). It is a Southern Star John Edwards production, and will be produced by John Edwards (The Secret Life of Us, Love My Way, Out Of The Blue) and Mimi Butler (Forensic Investigators, Blue Water High).

"Ten gave us the opportunity to break new ground in drama with The Secret Life of Us and now we've been given that kind of opportunity all over again," said producer John Edwards. Mimi Butler (producer) added, "It's exciting to be part of the next generation of action based drama. It's a very sexy cast, gun writers and a great chance to push the storytelling." Executive producer, drama and production, Network Ten, Rick Maier said: "Tonally this is a perfect fit for us. The idea is clean, the characters are complex, and the production team is the best in the business. It's also terrific to be working again with Script Producer Chris Lee (Police Rescue, The Secret Life Of Us). As with Secret Life of Us, the scripts are the key to a great series, and the writing team for is one of the best you will see. With Andrew Prowse (Farscape, Wildside, McLeod's Daughters) to direct, and the sensational calibre of this cast we're hopeful Rush will have an immediate impact for the audience."

Film Victoria CEO, Sandra Sdraulig, welcomes the production to Victoria saying, "We are thrilled that John Edwards and his team chose to film the series here. We look forward to working with the cast and crew, and believe Victoria's quality locations and skilled practitioners will contribute significantly to the success of the production." Production of Rush will be based in Victoria and will commence in May 2008.

These are prosperous times for Ten Network Holdings who claim the television advertising market is remarkably resilient despite the current global market malaise. Releasing the broadcaster's first-half results, Ten executive chairman Nick Falloon said the company was already tracking ahead of last year in the March and April period and tracking well in other months. Ten today posted a 617.3 per cent increase in first half net profit to $270.547 million. Shares in Ten (ASX: TEN: quote) rose 1.8 per cent to $2.26 in late afternoon trading today, as the benchmark S&P/ASX200 index slipped 0.4 per cent.

The profit result at the broadcaster includes an income tax benefit of $183.7 million stemming from the creation of the company as a consolidated group in February 2008. The 2007 half-year result also included a subordinated debenture interest of $43.3 million, which doesn't apply in 2008. On a normalised basis, net profit in the period to February 29, 2008, rose 16.9 per cent to $86.86 million. "We are already ahead of last year in the March/April period and tracking well in other months,'' Mr Falloon said. "As management predicted, Ten is gaining market share and we expect to further improve on our record start in key buying demographics. Television costs are firmly under control and, based on current projections, Ten is set to better 2007 EBITDA (earnings before interest tax depreciation and amortisation) in the current financial year.'' That projection would depend, however, on the Beijing Olympic Games and the state of the advertising market during that period, he said.

There was no such positive news over at ABC, where it has been revealed staff are to be made redundant as part of a restructure of the national broadcaster's television production department. Announcing the changes, ABC managing director Mark Scott would not say how many staff would be axed. Numbers would be revealed after consultations with staff, he said. However, he admitted the changes would be "a little tough" on workers.

Mr Scott confirmed the looming job losses as he announced the creation of a new division, ABC Resources, which will formally begin operation from July 1. Mr Scott said the changes would free money for Australian content and "quality journalism". The changes would lead to an emphasis on new technologies such as automated studio equipment and the creation of a more flexible, multi-skilled production workforce, he said, adding that new technologies would reduce the need for camera operators and production staff. TV news journalists will also trial new desktop editing systems.

News of the changes follows plans by the ABC to set up a dedicated 24-hour news service for TV, radio and online. Mr Scott said the ABC would try to minimise redundancies. "We're not specifying numbers today. We're not specifying precise money that we might be able to save," he told ABC Radio. "The ABC will be strengthened as a result of these changes, even though it's a little tough to go through." Mr Scott said the changes would make the ABC more efficient, but would not reduce quality. "We have received advice that there are significant opportunities to strengthen the ABC that can come if we take advantage of the technology that exists now to create news. And, if we can ensure that our television production processes are as efficient as they can be and are as efficient as they are in the independent production sector."

Critics have expressed concern about the ABC's outsourcing of TV jobs and work. Mr Scott said the broadcaster was committed to both internal and external production. But he pointed to The Chaser's War On Everything and Andrew Denton's Enough Rope chat show as examples of where external production worked well. "There are great benefits for us to be able to make programs in partnerships as well," he said. "This is taxpayers' money we're spending and if we can't make it as efficient internally as we can outside, then inevitably there'll be pressure to move production outside."

Mr Scott appealed to unions not to run scare campaigns over the changes. Graham Thompson, the ABC section secretary of the Community and Public Sector Union (CPSU), said he had concerns about the new direction. "Automation of TV studio will limit production," he said. "It will drive further production outsourcing to the private sector. There will be a lot of anxious people in the ABC workforce." He said he wanted to talk to the ABC in more depth about the changes before any action was considered.

Finally, there is little doubt Australia's TV ratings system is antiquated. The sample is laughably small — 1250 homes nationally are used to reflect the viewing tastes and frequency of more than 20 million Australians — and it fails to capture the full spectrum of consumption, including time-shifted programs, personal digital recorders, portable video players, broadband and downloads.

Last week Foxtel and Austar announced they would launch, in partnership with their commercial advertising joint venture Multi Channel Network (MCn), a new audience survey that will monitor 10,000 homes nationally and include time-shifted viewing and audience engagement with interactive advertising (so-called i-Ads). Such a system would be tilted towards the pay sector — all the homes will be pay TV homes — but it's a step in the right direction. It will allow a television business to monitor the audience's viewing habits away from the conventional TV set.

What seems astounding is that the free-to-air television industry hasn't taken steps to reinvigorate its own measurement system, particularly as the numbers it crunches seem to shrink annually. Ten years ago, hit shows were watched by 2.5 million viewers or more. Now the benchmark is closer to 1.3 million. The smaller numbers are caused in part by more shows in the middle spread and fewer high peaks, which leads most reporters to inaccurately conclude there are smaller volumes overall. However, they highlight the statistical difficulties of working with such a small sample.

Current ratings would have us believe just 1.3 million people are watching Underbelly, even though it has inspired a pirate DVD boom in Victoria. The system in its current form employs a sample that is statistically useless and hopelessly out of touch with rapid changes in the realm of personal home entertainment. The mantra for survival in the new-media world is adapt or die. Australia's commercial broadcasters would do well to heed it.

Further reading: Ten starts ratings war with Rush

Ashes fires back for second series

Retro BBC1 police drama Ashes to Ashes will return for a second series next year, the corporation confirmed today. The 1980s drama, a sequel to Life on Mars, set in 1973, has regularly attracted audiences of about 6 million viewers after the series opener was seen by more than 7 million.

Ashes to Ashes stars Keeley Hawes as psychologist Alex Drake, who is transported back to London in 1981 where she encounters Philip Glenister's no-nonsense detective Gene Hunt. The programme will return to BBC1 in 2009 after filming on the second series begins in the summer.

Details of the new series are being kept under wraps until the season one finale screens tonight, so it is unclear if Alex Drake remains in 1981 or returns to the present day after her parents die in a car bomb. "The 1980s have had a real revival over the past few months. Ashes to Ashes seems to have captured the imagination of the nation," said Simon Crawford-Collins, the executive producer and head of drama at Kudos Film and Television, the independent producer that makes the series in association with Monastic Productions. "I'm sure viewers will be desperate to know who's back in the second series, but for now they'll just have to tune into the last episode of series one to find out."

Julie Gardner, the executive producer for the BBC and BBC Wales head of drama, said she was delighted Ashes to Ashes would return. "The series epitomises all that is great about BBC drama with its bold, confident storytelling and great characters. I can't wait for more blue eyeliner, [Audi] Quattro cars and 1980s music to burst on to our screens in 2009."


Jericho too cynical for the times?

Was Jericho too cynical for the times? That is the question posed by Boston Globe's Joanna Weiss...

In the series finale of the post-apocalyptic drama Jericho, in an offhand conversation, a couple of characters voiced one of the show's underlying points: Don't mess with the Second Amendment. That's notable not just because it's a departure from typical Hollywood politics, or because the episode aired shortly after the Supreme Court heard a landmark case on the right to bear arms. It also speaks to an ongoing theme of the show, the notion that the government can't always be trusted. And if that doesn't sound especially radical, think of how it was received by viewers. Even amid an unpopular war, in a country with no shortage of cynics, a show this doubtful of the government's intentions can't seem to draw a mainstream audience.

Jericho, which ended its run on Tuesday, did have a small, fervent base of support, but it never managed to break through. The show was cancelled for low viewership by CBS last spring, then resurrected for a seven-episode trial run after fans sent nuts to the network offices. (It was a reference to a we-won't-back-down slogan in the show, as well as to the Battle of the Bulge.) This season's arc - which drew even fewer viewers than last year's episodes - played out as a cautionary tale about the perils of a government that gains too much power. Like HBO's brilliant The Wire, which ended its fifth and final season this month, it was one of few TV shows to take a decidedly cynical view of the people in charge.

Most of the time, on TV, we get the opposite message. The detectives, lawyers, and forensic scientists of the enduring Law and Order and CSI incarnations are universally good. The fighting forces of CBS's The Unit sacrifice greatly to save us all. Even the corrupt cops on FX's The Shield are softies at the core, skimming off the top to pay for family essentials, such as private-school tuition for autistic kids. And though each season of Fox's 24 has its fair share of government high-ups gone bad, the traitors are always exceptions, destined to be caught. To the end, Jericho made no such promises. If The Wire was a real-time look at corruption and fatal compromise in Baltimore, Jericho was a worst-case-scenario fantasy, spelled out with intriguing detail. It began with a dread attack: 23 American cities destroyed by nuclear bombs. It asked what would happen next from the perspective of regular folks, represented by the good-hearted citizens of a Kansas town.

Jericho didn't fully live up to its what-if potential. The show ended up going the easy 24 route of fingering a single, dastardly mastermind. (Could it be an accident that he was played by Xander Berkeley, who was prominent in the early seasons of 24?) And despite considerable pressure, the core of regular folks got through with their principles intact. Still Jericho didn't end on an entirely happy note. The finale offered a hint of what would have come if the show had won a third season: a civil war between the forces of good and corruption, and a decent chance that corruption would still prevail. Perhaps it's no wonder it got so few takers; on TV these days, we still prefer to focus on the good.

It's much easier, after all, to sell a show about charitable giving or cheerful redemption, preferably set to uplifting music. On ABC's Dancing With the Stars the other night, contestant Steve Guttenberg gushed about how nice this show was for America. And on American Idol this week, on-the-bubble contestant Kristy Lee Cook made a decent effort to have save herself by crooning Lee Greenwood's uberpatriotic God Bless the USA. That song has a widely perceived Second Amendment message, too. It's just a message that doesn't require quite so much thinking.


Geoff Berkshire from the LA Times has his own thoughts on the demise of Jericho. He outlines the prime reasons as:

The strike
Conventional wisdom reckoned that the WGA strike and the resulting dearth of scripted shows during the winter would help Jericho stand out among weakened competition. But the winter's reality-heavy environment might have made it even more difficult for Jericho to connect with audiences. Viewers were tuning out in droves and CBS took one of the biggest ratings hits among all networks, leaving a limited audience to promote the Jericho return to. Even freshly written episodes of Late Show With David Letterman struggled due to the overall decline in CBS viewership.

The time slot
CBS moved the series out of the family-friendly 8 p.m. hour to 10 p.m. and there's the possibility that many of the original viewers were unwilling to follow. In defence of CBS, part of the plan was to give Jericho an established lead-in. Unfortunately (due in no small part to the strike) that established lead-in was the sleaze-tastic reality show Big Brother 9, which had never before aired outside of the low-expectations summer season. The audiences were, to put it kindly, completely incompatible and for a few weeks Jericho wound up with slightly better numbers than Big Brother anyway.

The network
Everyone's favourite scapegoat. Clearly everything that went wrong with Jericho was entirely CBS' fault! Never mind that they took a big, and welcome, risk by bringing the show back in the first place. Let's face it, a serial drama was always going to have a rough go of things on the network's current schedule. Jericho didn't repeat its plotlines every week, or solve a problem within the hour, and that seems to be the only way to find success as a scripted drama on CBS right now. Hopefully the experience doesn't discourage the network from taking similar chances in the future, but stepping back and looking at the whole picture I'd say that both the network and the producers tried their best to make an unlikely marriage work. Some couples just aren't meant to be ...

Alternative means of viewing
Some people will point to how popular Jericho is with TiVo users, or how high it ranks among iTunes downloads, or how well the Season 1 DVDs sold on Amazon.com. That's all great as an after-market for a show that draws an audience to its ad-supported broadcast airings. CBS isn't HBO. The amount of people who watch on live TV (and the age and income level of those people) really does matter. And if you downloaded Jericho through BitTorrent, it's really not a good idea to go crying to CBS about how much you'll miss the show.

The fans
A controversial argument to be sure. But if only the Jericho fans had shown a little bit of passion ... oh forget it, no one's gonna buy this one.

The ratings
Last season, Jericho averaged 9.5 million viewers and a 2.8 in the 18-49 demo. This season, the show averaged 6.8 million viewers and a 1.9 in the 18-49 demo. The defence may raise mitigating factors, like the shady way Nielsen measures the audience or everything else mentioned above, but the bottom line is that those numbers are barely acceptable on NBC. On CBS, they'll get you a death sentence. Case closed.

Further reading: Sifting through the ashes

Small stations sue over digital TV plan

Small U.S. television station owners are facing a "death sentence" because of a flaw in the government's plan to force broadcasters to shift to digital broadcasting and have asked a federal judge for a reprieve, reports John Dunbar. The Community Broadcasters Association wants the Federal Communications Commission to ban all digital set top converter boxes that are not equipped to receive an analogue signal, a request that has the potential to derail the biggest broadcasting transition since colour television.

As of Feb. 18, 2009, all full-power television stations in the U.S. are scheduled to stop broadcasting an analogue signal. Anyone who gets programming through an antenna and does not have a newer-model digital TV set will need to buy a box that will convert the digital signal to analogue. The government is providing two $40 coupons per household that can be used to buy these boxes. The problem facing the 2,600 low-power television stations represented by the association is that they are not subject to the deadline. Viewers who buy a converter box may actually block the low-power analog signal from those stations, while the full-power digital signal displays normally. The association, in a petition filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on Wednesday, asked the FCC to stop the marketing and distribution of the boxes.

The association cited a 1962 law called the All Channel Receiver Act which was adopted during the early years of UHF broadcasting. The law requires that devices that receive television signals be capable of picking up "all frequencies allocated by the FCC to television broadcasting." It is not certain how many viewers may be affected. The association characterizes its viewers as rural, underserved urban, elderly and non-English speaking. In addition to low-power stations, about 4,300 translator stations, which boost signals from full-power stations and relay them to rural areas, also are exempt from the 2009 deadline.

Nothing in the law prevents low-power stations from converting to digital, but for most stations, the cost is prohibitive. Ronald Bruno, president of the association, said converter boxes currently for sale will decrease viewership for low-power stations. "Every time a person gets a coupon, buys a converter box and plugs it in, we lose that viewer," he said. The FCC had no comment on the suit.

The converter box program is overseen by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration. Agency spokesman Bart Forbes said the law ordering the transition says boxes can "only receive digital signals" and the NTIA specifications on box design are consistent with the law. Gary Shapiro, president and CEO of the Consumer Electronics Association, accused the broadcast association of "trying an 11th-hour litigation strategy to freeze the entire nation in analogue." As of March 25, the NTIA reported it has received requests for 8.5 million coupons from 4.5 million households.

Six of the converter boxes that have been approved for sale by the NTIA allow for an analogue "pass-through" feature. According to the NTIA, they are the Philco TB150HH9, the Philco TB100HH9, the ECHOSTAR TR-40, the Magnavox TB-100MG9, the Digital Stream DX8700 and the Digital Sream DSP7700T. Such a feature would allow televisions to receive an analog signal, but Bruno says they are confusing and "do not create an acceptable solution for the over-the-air viewer." To view analog channels, viewers would have to turn off the digital converter box and use a separate remote control.

Elsewhere, NATO plans to start an online TV channel to improve the image of the Western military alliance. The initiative will be launched at a summit next week in Bucharest, Romania, alliance spokesman James Appathurai said Wednesday. Much of its coverage will focus on the mission of the alliance's 47,000 troops in Afghanistan. NATO plans to have five TV crews sending regular reports from the country. The channel will be available on the alliance's Web site, http://www.nato.int. Broadcast quality footage will also be available for TV networks to download. Denmark is providing much of the funding for the project, which is part of an effort to boost flagging public support in several allied countries for the Afghanistan mission

Reality TV bites

Despite ITV profits being down and its relaunch muted, Michael Grade, its irrepressible boss, tells Andrew Billen how he will turn the channel around - without reality television...

According to Michael Grade, Eric Morecambe used to carry with him an old review from the Daily Express that went: “Is that a television I see before me? No, it's the box the BBC buried Morecambe and Wise in last night.” Television's great anecdotalist, you see, is offering me a little story that puts journalists in our place. Grade's daring new ITV schedule included a series of flops, but its executive chairman is not breaking into flop sweat. “It's tough, but you have got to have faith in the material. Look at the material, forget the numbers, look at the audience- appreciation figures and say to yourself, 'Do we believe in this show?' If you do, you go with it.”

Less happily for him, the Eric and Ernie story spotlights another fact. Although he jokes he is the “Jewish Dorian Gray”, Grade was 65 on March 8. His career stretches so far back that he was actually the agent who negotiated Morecambe and Wise's return to the BBC after a career-saving sojourn in commercial television. ITV shareholders, now nursing a share price half what it was when Grade took over last year, may not be as impressed as I am by stories that star Norman Wisdom, Frankie Vaughan, Bruce Forsyth, Tony Hancock and the Two Ronnies. Those were the days, my friend. A storm squalls past his penthouse office in ITV Towers. An invisible cigar dances in front of his face. I ask if big-name talent still counts in television. Of course, he says - although the talent is a bit different, a bit smarter, a bit more challenging, these days. He cites ITV's Al Murray and Harry Hill. But it is when I query the point of another pair of ITV faces, the distinctly unchallenging Ant and Dec, that the conversation gets interesting.

“Uncomplicated, straightforward, unpretentious and so agreeable,” he says of the Saturday Night Takeaway stars. “You know, there's an awful lot of TV over the past five years that has been about cruelty and voyeurism. They're an antidote to all of that. It's just nice. Like Bruce, you know, Bruce Forsyth. I was at his 80th birthday party the other night and had to say a few words. I said, 'The great thing about Bruce is words like cruelty and humiliation are not in his vocabulary'.”

Is the age of cruelty, evident in most reality TV, drawing to a close? “I think it's gone too far. Yes, I do. I think once you go down that road, as Big Brother has, all you can do is just keep turning up the heat and it becomes almost car-crash television in human terms. When Big Brother started I thought it was an absolutely brilliant, brilliant show. It was about relationships and the dynamics of different personalities and so on, but it's kind of descended into a rather toe-curling observational show about people that just want to be famous.” A senior Channel 4 executive told me that it had become an embarrassment that they'd like to junk. “I think it's rescuable. I think they should just go back to its origins, which is find some really interesting people and throw them together. See how the schoolteacher interacts with the bookmaker. It's not my problem. But what's interesting is that when Britain's Got Talent hit the airways it was on nine consecutive nights and it started at whatever it was, four million, four and a half million, and the show built in a really amazingly steep line and we ended up whatever it was, 12, 12 and a half million on the last night.”

In the middle of it there was an away day with Simon Shaps, ITV's outgoing director of television. (“He invited me,” he says diplomatically.) And they were on a high because of the success, and he told them that maybe, maybe, there was something important about this particular talent show that they should watch carefully. And that important thing was that the show was essentially a “celebration”. As the week wore on, he had noticed that even the most outspoken judges, Simon Cowell and Piers Morgan, were throwing less mud, their comments becoming more constructive. “There was a tonal shift. And the success of shows such as Doc Martin - I don't know whether you've seen that, set in Cornwall - Kingdom, Lewis to a certain extent, Wild at Heart, these are very agreeable shows. It's not the hard-edged, seamy side of graphic, horrible life. I think there's a mood change.”

But what, I interrupt, of the early audition sequences in The X Factor in which overweight teenagers and pensioners with speech impediments are ridiculed by the millionaire Cowell? He thinks Cowell, whose judgements are so “brilliant”, has softened even on The X Factor. “I think the tone is absolutely right on the show and it is a celebration of talent. It builds towards that.” He offers an historical analysis of popular entertainment. In the Depression, Hollywood pedalled Busby Berkeley musicals, Cinderella-stories, escapism. As prosperity grew in the Sixties, Britain became ready for kitchen-sink reality. I ask, then, if nicer television predicts a recession. “No, I'm predicting that people want celebration and they want to feel good.” Which would mean no more Prime Suspect or Cracker? “Well, they're so established that they're not susceptible to that trend. They're such brilliant masterpieces of television. But I think there is a mood change.”

Could it be that British TV's most experienced executive is once again ahead of the curve and that we critics are to be left grumbling behind it? The problem if he is right, however, is that ITV's latest week-night offerings have not been uncomplicated, straightforward or unpretentious. Nor have they been very agreeable to ITV audiences. Grade is in his office by 8am. He reads the Financial Times, The Guardian and then the press clippings. At around 9.30am the “overnights”, the viewing figures, flash on his screen. None of the above can have made easy reading in the weeks since he launched his new schedules in January. Not one of ITV1's 9pm dramas rated even 5 million viewers. In consequence, the relaunch of News at Ten was scuppered.

“The thing that would really have depressed me was if the shows were ghastly, but I thought The Palace was extremely good. Difficult for an ITV audience? What is this? Is this a mickey-take of the Royal Family? Is it a spoof? What is it?' It was kind of difficult. Was it a compelling piece of popular drama? Yes.” More of it? “Don't know. I haven't talked to Simon [Shaps]. We'll look at the research and so on. Moving Wallpaper: best new comedy since The Thick of It or The Office. Total surprise for ITV to be doing a comedy as clever and as funny as that.”

The Billen household agreed, I say, but then we thought of the in-laws, in their sixties, fans of The Bill. What they would make of it? “Look. ITV got to a point a few years ago where it was bit like the Tory party: absolutely down to its hardcore support, no floating voters, no light viewers. The hardcore of support was pretty big, but nevertheless you can't grow from there. And what we're having to do is to refresh the schedule, get people reading our listings again.” But can he afford to lose his hardcore? Because every time the Tories have tried to reach out, they've eventually reverted to courting their hardcore supporters, because, as William Hague said, you need someone to vote for you. “It's a limited metaphor,” he says.

He has held all of the big jobs in British television: director of programmes at both LWT and BBC, chief executive of Channel 4 and, in a return to broadcasting that surprised no one as much as himself, chairman of the BBC after Greg Dyke was fired. By defecting to ITV, the prodigal returned to the family business, much of which was originally owned by his uncle, Lew Grade. ITV is his birthright. He remembers being unhappily lodged at boarding school and being cheered when ATV, the channel Lew owned, announced its launch in 1955 with a racy, half-page advertisement in The Times. “Tiller Girls in The Times! That was the family. That was pretty special.”

But the home he has come back to has changed. He rightly insisted on the return of News at Ten but already under his tenure ITV has abolished the Sunday politics slot made famous by Weekend World and Walden. With the departure of Jonathan Dimbleby, it no longer even has a star political interviewer. (He expects to be in “good shape” on that score by the election.) The channel that enriched my childhood with Robin Hood, Thunderbirds and Magpie no longer broadcasts children's programmes during the week. (“It's not sustainable, not supportable today in the commercial world.”) The regions that used to produce the most watched local programmes on television are merging and local news is being moved to the net. (“I'd like to keep doing regional news because I think it's one of the things that distinguishes ITV, but we must be left to configure it in a way that we think is affordable and sustainable.”) As for culture, the man who claims to have scheduled Glyndebourne on ITV at prime-time confesses that if his cultural commissar Lord Bragg came to him with an equivalent project he would say no.

“It was a patrician age, a golden age, unquestionably, but we're very, very lucky in this country that we still have support for public intervention in the market, mainly the BBC.” So is ITV any longer a public service broadcaster? “I think that public service broadcasting means different things to different channels now, to be honest. What is public broadcasting so far as ITV is concerned is very different to the BBC. Public service broadcasting, in my book, for ITV is where the public interest and the shareholders' interests combine, and that's in investment, a billion pounds of investment every year in British production for British audiences. But we must be free to decide what we make and how we spend that money.” He wants to be freed from the regulatory chains that still shackle ITV and were applied when it still held “a licence to print money”. But even if the obligations were loosened, it could still go so wrong. If ITV's share price continues to fall, the broadcaster could be bought by foreigners. By 2012, when the final analogue transmitter is switched off, Britain might be left with the BBC, Channel 4 and any number of Living TVs, one of which might be called ITV.

“It is possible, yes. It certainly is.” Is he here to ensure that does not happen? “I'm here to make a business out of ITV again. That's what I'm here to do.” ITV's viewing share across all its channels is up, but its revenues are down. Two weeks ago it announced a 35 per cent collapse in profits. The business press, initially excited by his arrival, now doubts him. One journalist, citing the decline of the Grade family business, First Leisure, the one that once owned Blackpool Tower, wrote that he was “either a rotten businessman or an unlucky one”.

“Ten minutes of desktop research will tell you the proper history of First Leisure, which was a mini- retail leisure conglomerate in businesses that were all ex-growth. I broke up the company, gave the cash back to the shareholders and a lot of the businesses that I sold at the top of the market have since gone bust.” First Leisure may be no success story but it shows that Grade, for all his twinkly assertions of family values, is not a sentimentalist. Bernie Delfont's widow, who recently died, fiercely denounced his strategy. Equally, when all those years ago he negotiated Morecambe and Wise's escape from ATV, he risked and received Uncle Lew's displeasure. And here is another thing. Although Grade is criticised for keeping too much power to himself at ITV, he claims to be a hands-off boss. Indeed, when we meet, I am in the strange position of knowing more about ITV's new thriller series, The Fixer, than Grade. I have reviewed a preview disc; the man at the top of ITV does not watch his main channel's commissions before transmission.

“That's Simon's job. That's not my job.” But he is meant to be good at spotting winners. “You've got to be careful, you know. I'm now 65, my taste is...what can I say? You've got to leave it to the youngsters.”

As it happens, The Fixer on its first airing rated well at 6.2 million. I am glad for him. In his memoirs, a decade ago, he confessed that his personal life had paid a high cost for his career. Now on his third and happiest marriage, with a son aged 9, he is running a beleaguered company at a time when his contemporaries are on the golf course and watching The Bill. The cruel age of reality television may be over; the realities of television will only get crueller. It would be terrible if ITV became the box in which its favourite son was buried, so good if Grade turned out to be The Fixer.

 

Copyright 2007 ID Media Inc, All Right Reserved. Crafted by Nurudin Jauhari